Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Bulk-fill º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø, ¹Ï°í »ç¿ëÇصµ µÉ±î?

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2019³â 57±Ç 3È£ p.162 ~ 168
°í°á, ¹ÚÁ¤¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°í°á ( Koh Kyeol ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °­³²¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸°ú
¹ÚÁ¤¿ø ( Park Jeong-Won ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °­³²¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸°ú

Abstract


Composite resin restorations in posterior teeth are increasing due to the aesthetic needs of patients and the development of materials. This trend will accelerate in line with domestic insurance policies. However, resin composites generate stresses due to their contraction during the polymerization process. To reduce the polymerization shrinkage stress of resin composites, incremental layering technique has been recommended for decades. This technique reduces stress at the cavity wall interface and allows a more efficient light curing of the material. Bulk-fill resin composites have been designed to simplify the restorative technique because they can be placed into cavities in a single increment of 4-5mm. The simplification of the operative procedures is desirable in clinical daily practice. In this context, bulk-fill resin composites are an attractive alternative for posterior restorations. However, a clearer understanding of the clinical performance of this relatively new class of materials in comparison to conventional resin composites is required. Based on previous studies, the aim of the current review was to present the clinical criteria for the use of bulk-fill composites in direct restorations of posterior teeth.

Å°¿öµå

Bulk-fill composites; polymerization; shrinkage stress; longevity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI